Check these:
Thanks TNT_BOM_BOM - really appreciated.
All of the above finished. Except:
I didnt got what you mean, do you mean i should change that only pic or i should change every single pic for the 3 pages?
Thanks.
Can I get a different image for each page please?
We could use this for onion links from whonix.org to anywhere else.
- https://github.com/privacytoolsIO/privacytools.io/blob/master/assets/img/layout/tor.svg
- https://github.com/privacytoolsIO/privacytools.io/blob/master/assets/img/layout/tor.png
- GitHub - privacytoolsIO/privacy-tools: Suggestions and Discussions for PrivacyTools.io
- https://github.com/privacytoolsIO/privacytools.io/blob/master/LICENSE.txt
Link archiving required.
Download and upload to whonix.org require.
All the above have been finished
This green button (āimageā) (actually html, not even an image) Template:Free - Whonix which links to Why Whonix ā¢ will always be Free as in Price as well as in Freedom is used on many pages, see:
Itās purpose is to illustrate:
- [1] Freedom Software (or the often misunderstood non-ideal terms āFree Softwareā or āOpen Sourceā), and
- [2] As well as, free in price, free of charge.
Can you suggest image(s) which illustrate that better? Are there popular images used for this purpose? Which are the most common images to illustrate āFree Softwareā?
Could be either one image or two depending on whatās best.
I donāt really like the logo saying āOpen Sourceā since Open Source misses the point.
http://studentlanka.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/opensource-logo.png
https://opensource.org/logo-usage-guidelines
But looks like one of the more popular images.
Maybe the Open Source logo not saying āOpen Sourceā would be better. This one:
But would require higher resolution version. Also would require if it is acceptable and legal to use.
The GPLv3 logo
File:GPLv3 Logo.svg - Wikipedia
is nice but not suitable since Whonix is a compilation of software under Freedom Software licenses.
For the Kicksecure/About draft I use the term open-source and Freedom Software on that page . This might be a little confusing to readers.
no need , GNU logo is better and representing freedom/libre/free & Operating System.
good ones:
Done
Only GNU projects can call themselves GNU. Whonix is not a GNU project. I havenāt seen any non-GNU projects using the GNU logo. I donāt think GNU would allow putting the GNU logo on a non-GNU project?
Note: This is not licensing. This is trademark.
Found it:
source: A GNU Head by Etienne Suvasa - GNU Project - Free Software Foundation - Quote:
The GNU head is, however, also a trademark for the GNU Project. If you want to use the GNU head to link to a website run by the Free Software Foundation or the GNU project, feel free, or if youāre using it in contexts talking about GNU in a supportive and accurate way, you can also do this without permission. For any other requests, please ask <licensing@fsf.org> for permission first.
Not allowed for our use case āillustrate Open Sourceā.
These images are available under the GNU Free Documentation License v1.3, or the Free Art License, or the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 2.0 License.
Itās not a contradiction to above. One could use the logo or parts of it (perhaps just an eye) and create something totally different which cannot be confused to be the GNU logo. A logo under a free license and yet trademarked may look like a contradiction at first but itās not.
Amaya FreeNOS (non GNU/Linux) but uses GNU head logo:
(because they agree on the free software philosophy as GPLv3)
So no problem from using the full logo/head.
Not allowed for our use case āillustrate Open Sourceā.
Which part of Whonix illustrate Open Source but not or contradict Free Software?