List of Hosting Providers That Accept Cryptocurrencies as Payment

General Tor and Anonymity Talk
1

This is a list of hosting providers in alphabetical order with whom you can pay using cryptocurrencies.

Note: I haven’t tested any of them. Please report any issues if they are encountered.

If you know of more providers, please write them down so that I can add them to the list.

3 Likes
2

Hello, Dear @nurmagoz

Alexhost doesn’t ask for real info (except if payment gateway asks for it, that is something we can’t control i.e Paypal)

Alexhost respects the privacy of the client and allow freedom of speech.
We accept crypto payments like Monero and many more! Can you add us to your list?

Thank you,
Alexhost

2 Likes
3

Apologies for the delayed response. It’s a positive aspect, but I recommend enhancing and fortifying the DNS and TLS checks on your website. For example:

To have someone take your service seriously, you need to demonstrate it through actions, not just words.

It is preferable to have an onion entry for your website.

Added your website to the list.

1 Like
4

Hostiko:

Cryptocurrency support:

  • Bitcoin
  • Monero
  • Dogecoin
  • Ethereum

Locations:

  • Falkenstein, Germany :de:
  • Warsaw, Poland :poland:
  • Kyiv, Ukraine :ukraine:

See also:

I plan on rewriting the current list of web hosting providers into a Markdown table sometime later in 2025 with multiple entries not already mentioned above.

1 Like
5

Skhron.eu. Accepted Monero, BTC, Ltc, another

1 Like
6

Pulse Servers (OVHcloud VPS reseller):

Cryptocurrency support (via BTCPay Server):

  • Bitcoin
  • Litecoin

Locations:

  • Erith, London, United Kingdom :uk:
  • Hillsboro, Oregon, US :us:
  • Beauharnois, Montreal, Qubebec, Canada :canada:

See also:

7

I would like to request that the topic be changed into a wiki so that I and/or others can update and maintain this resource.

8

In wiki chapter Anonymous Third Party Hosts there once was a list. It has been deprecated.

So what happens: Someone makes an edit. Perhaps even the hosting company itself. I don’t know anything about them, have no way to vet them.

If the edit is accepted, these are easily misconstrued recommendations. And bad reputation by a hosting providers reflects badly on Whonix.

Then at it happened earlier on Telegram on other topics: Some user accuses a service provider of being a bad service or even scam. Makes an accusation. The service provider refutes the claim, making for the message to be deleted and threatens legal action.

I don’t have the capability and time (neither it would be a good use of project resources to assign time of this) to adjudicate such disputes.

1 Like
9

I will be slowly working on creating a table for anonymous third-party web hosting providers:

Related:

Background:

1 Like
10

I added an edit to the aforementioned wiki page of a basic table stylized similar to the subsequent Tor Project resource with these minimum requirements:

  1. Tor Browser support.
  2. No KYC.
  3. Cryptocurrency support.
  4. Last monthly update of the above three requirements.

Long-term plan:

  1. Verify every entry in the table every month for ongoing fulfillment of the minimum requirements.
  2. Manually review every entry from the Tor Project’s Good Bad ISPs and related resources for potential inclusion:

Flawed:

  1. KYC ↩︎ ↩︎ ↩︎

  2. Cryptocurrency unsupported ↩︎

  3. Tor Browser unsupported ↩︎

11

A link to a centralized cryptocurrency payment processor has been removed.

To maintain neutrality and avoid potential controversies, a link to a centralized cryptocurrency payment processor has been removed. Some of these entities have been reported to misuse KYC/AML regulations to withhold customer funds under questionable circumstances. While proving or disproving such claims publicly is challenging, credible sources have provided reliable information on these practices. As a result, it is preferable to refrain from engaging in this discussion.

Additional disclaimers have been added to clarify that this is a community-maintained list, and Whonix does not vet or endorse any of the listed services. This measure helps ensure that any potential disputes regarding service quality or reliability remain independent of Whonix.

1 Like
12

Okay, I have removed Hostiko as an entry due their dependency on this centralized cryptocurrency payment processor, and will use this refined criteria for future table updates from this point onward.

1 Like
13

Interesting, thanks for the info.

So only evolution mentioned in the list, i removed it.

1 Like
14

added to the list.

1 Like
15

https://kycnot.me/?t=&q=vps&xmr=on

3 Likes
16

I’ve moved some post(s) from long wiki edit threads back to here.

@nurmagoz considered these contributions for the first forum post here.

@FranklyFlawless plans to move to and maintain the list inside the wik here:
Anonymous Web Third-Party Hosting Providers
(The list has already been started.)

@nurmagoz probably won’t mind if the first post of this topic gets edited and/or turned into a wiki?

2 Likes
17

yeah sure, good idea :+1:.

2 Likes
18

The transition is complete, so I suggest removing the hypertext reference of this Discourse topic from the Whonix Wiki.

Flawed:

I plan on revising the Tor Project’s Good Bad ISPs page, then consolidating any eligible entries from there and KYCNOT.ME to the Whonix Wiki for the next monthly update.

  1. Centralized cryptocurrency processor ↩︎ ↩︎ ↩︎ ↩︎ ↩︎ ↩︎ ↩︎

  2. KYC ↩︎ ↩︎ ↩︎ ↩︎ ↩︎ ↩︎ ↩︎ ↩︎ ↩︎ ↩︎ ↩︎

  3. Defunct ↩︎

  4. Cryptocurrency unsupported ↩︎

  5. Tor Browser unsupported ↩︎ ↩︎

1 Like
19

I made the first post a discourse wiki. Could you try to edit please?

1 Like
20

Yes, I edited and resorted the entire list from this topic in alphabetical order, although the relevance of it is now strictly limited to web hosting providers with cryptocurrency payment support, regardless of Tor Browser accessibility, KYC/AML, and/or centralized cryptocurrency payment processors. If such a generalized list is desired, then Evolution Host should be readded as an entry.

2 Likes