Information
ID: 94
PHID: PHID-TASK-jnaivhgs2gg7gswuuymy
Author: JasonJAyalaP
Status at Migration Time: resolved
Priority at Migration Time: Normal
Description
older info:
- anonymity - Tracking User Location using Entry Guards? - Tor Stack Exchange (http://www.webcitation.org/6RTwwSWvw)
- anonymity - Is it dangerous to use Tails without persistent entry guards? - Tor Stack Exchange (http://www.webcitation.org/6RTwx8bil)
- Support more stable guards for live CDs: Support more stable guards for live CDs (#2653) · Issues · Legacy / Trac · GitLab
- The tor-talk October 2012 Archive by subject
- [tor-talk] Location-aware persistent guards
update:
Number of entry guards was reduced to 1 since then. (As per changelog.)
see also:
- persistent_Tor_state · Wiki · tails / blueprints · GitLab
- https://blog.torproject.org/blog/tor-weekly-news-—-june-17th-2015#A_persistent_Tor_state_for_Tails section
A persistent Tor state for Tails?
TODO:
- Under the new situation of reduced number of default entry guards, ask the above questions again to see if situation has changed.
Documentation could explain how to stop the Tor service; wipe Tor’s data dir; start Tor service; connect.
Editing /etc/tor/torrc
by adding the following could do the trick.
DataDirectory /var/run/tor
After every reboot, Tor would use new entry guards. Maybe extra AppArmor rules would be required.
Comments
JasonJAyalaP
2015-01-16 20:01:44 UTC
Patrick
2015-01-17 00:22:25 UTC
HulaHoop
2015-06-21 19:55:23 UTC
Patrick
2015-06-21 22:23:28 UTC
Patrick
2015-06-22 16:22:38 UTC
HulaHoop
2015-06-22 19:37:20 UTC
Patrick
2015-06-22 23:09:50 UTC
Patrick
2016-02-10 17:32:53 UTC