Add one more group and name it “Jobs” and it will refer to wiki page which contains job vacancies , tasks , with paid and volunteer parts.
The written line is blurred not really clear and hurt the eyes.
Add heart,gift… symbols to the wiki and makes it more refreshing
Its not really necessary saying that , because its already defined below what is whonix “Whonix is a desktop …”, so “High Security Method of Surfing the Internet” is enough and great.
number and they are clear no need to explain them.
It’s a logo. It’s a design (website layout template). The design persists on all pages. (There is just two pages https://www.whonix.org and https://www.whonix.org/download/ at this point.) It’s customary on most websites to keep the logo and navigation bar the same for all pages.
I see it as not really we describing well all the distros that whonix might run above mention in our homepage. as whonix can run over vbox whether its GNU/Linux or Unix or Solars or X OS.
to fix that:-
Change the images and description instead of operating system photos (windows,linux,macos) , then we put virtualization images like Vbox , KVM , Qubes/Xen (Qubes can be kept the same) , Physical hardware.
also static home page can be modified and upgraded to dynamic one and i see this project have great idea:
I think operating system description/photos are more recognizable than virtualization images. Inexperienced users won’t even bother to go any further if they don’t see their OS listed as supported. Most won’t even know what a hypervisor is. Plus I don’t know of any other major OS stating all the platforms that their software is compatible with. Just the main/most popular ones. Replacing what we currently have will just lead to confusion IMO.
…etc for the rest of the virtualizers. (its just needs some creative design)
i just wanted to say that we as well support all of the platforms , not just what is mentioned on the homepage. e.g: users of BSD,Solaris,GNU/Hurd…etc once they see only the operating systems listed there then they run away, whereas this is not actually the case they just need to use the hypervisor which we support regardless what the distro is, because as you know whonix doenst work on any distro without the hypervisor. So if the hypervisor supporting an OS or dropped supported an OS then we are linked to that.
On the other hand too much detail chases away other users.
I would expect users of BSD,Solaris,GNU/Hurd and alike who went through the lengths of using these operating systems to not be discouraged about only reading “Linux”. They would be used to that already. There are always conflicting choices what to focus on and what to leave out. Impossible to suit everyone at once.
GNU/X11/Linux/TeX/Perl/Python/systemd is absurd. No one speaks GNU/Linux. I don’t think GNU [...] either. And Linux is the established word in common language.
I consider a debate of this pointless and only willing to reconsider if most Whonix contributors feel strongly about this.
When Linus Torvalds was asked in the documentary Revolution OS whether the name “GNU/Linux” was justified, he replied:
Well, I think it’s justified, but it’s justified if you actually make a GNU distribution of Linux … the same way that I think that “Red Hat Linux” is fine, or “SuSE Linux” or “Debian Linux”, because if you actually make your own distribution of Linux, you get to name the thing, but calling Linux in general “GNU Linux” I think is just ridiculous
Not a matter of write or wrong. Pointless to debate.