[HOME] [DOWNLOAD] [DOCS] [NEWS] [SUPPORT] [TIPS] [ISSUES] [DONATE]

Crypto anonymity is getting harder

Shapeshift now requires email registration to trade. Correlating trades now becomes trivial for them, or we need to keep at least 2 emails for this purpose (BTC -> XMR and XMR ->BTC transactions). And, they impose an endless ReCaptcha. And they include Google trackers anyway. And JS of course.

localbitcoins requires ID verification once the user reaches a certain volume (not a very high volume: about 20 trades or 2 BTC a year).

Poloniex moved to ID verification long ago, even for crypto only trades.

The purpose of this topic isn’t to argue for or against cryptocurrencies in general. Please refrain. It is to share ideas, tools and possible solutions how to maximize anonymity, within the limitations.

I will sincerely appreciate feedback on those lines.

Also discussed here:

Flyp.me that’s mentioned in the article doesn’t include Monero in it’s cryptocurrencies lists.

Interesting!

Yes, unfortunately governments worldwide (the fiat money system) wants
or are bullied into applying KYC almost everywhere. Certainly when an
account gets created somewhere where anything more than petty cash is
involved. Left behind are millions of unbanked people due to these
excessive, decadent policies.

Related:

chicken:

Poloniex moved to ID verification long ago, even for crypto only trades.

The purpose of this topic isn’t to argue for or against cryptocurrencies in general.

Right. Did not perceive it in that way anyhow.

Please refrain. It is to share ideas, tools and possible solutions how to maximize anonymity, within the limitations.

Sure.

1 Like

Shapeshift alternative Changelly also requires KYC in some cases, especially when Monero is involved - it’s not an alternative at all.

There are decentralized and peer- to-peer exchanges, like Bisq, where you can trade without KYC.

What are the real motives behind KYC and government regulation of cryptocurrencies anyway? Defending the monopoly of banks over money? Saving the banks once again from collapse? Keeping the unbanked unbanked, the poor poor?

1 Like

Shred:

What are the real motives behind KYC and government regulation of cryptocurrencies anyway? Defending the monopoly of banks over money? Saving the banks once again from collapse?

Yes.

KYC among other tons of regulations highers the bar for new market
players and thereby effectively prevents them. Banks aren’t evil because
it’s inherent, they’re evil due to lack of competition. The competition
is kept small by regulation which is difficult and expensive to comply with.

  • anti-terrorism: probably not what they are interested in (not to
    mention that a lot of terrorism is actually state-sponsored)
  • tax enforcement: could be
  • censorship of opposition: yes (transfers to wikileaks blocked,
    accounts of activists terminated)
  • geopolitics: yes (sanctions against countries, know who transacts with
    whom and be able to stop it)

Functions of money:

  • store of value
  • medium of exchange
  • unit of account
  • often overlooked: system of control

Keeping the unbanked unbanked, the poor poor?

That’s a hard one. From external observation it’s imo not possible to
distinguish between “evil”, “incompetent” and “don’t care”. Maybe it’s a
question of priority in favor of regulation and in their view the
unbanked have to deal with it as is.

1 Like

XMR->BTC can still be done by xmr.to - no account required and works well with the Tor Browser.

Bisq - an application download is required. That’s additional security risk. Anyone has experience running it in Whonix Workstation?

Shapeshift - this is even worse than I thought. Not only they need an email address and giving Tor users a terrible time, they actually require users to perform authentication on their mobile device with Google Authenticator. So, they can’t even be used as a temporary option for a few transactions (unless users escalate to burner phones…). They moved overnight from being completely OK with Tor and anonymous usage to a strict authentication.

1 Like

keepassxc can be used as a replacement for Google Authenticator (actually TTOP, Time based One Time Password) on desktop computers on Windows, Qubes OS (recommended), Linux (recommended) or Mac.

Related:

1 Like

The installation didn’t work for me (64 bit?), but I managed to do it with that instead:

https://totp.danhersam.com/

And then I discover… that there is a last stage as well - ID verification. Easier to open a bank account.

1 Like

Yes, I use Bisq in a Whonix workstation. Works very well, all connections are over hidden services, and truly decentralized p2p.

One caveat: end up with Tor over Tor. Possibly because of onion-grater, but (IIRC) a few weeks ago I pcap’d the traffic and I didn’t even see an attempt at contacting the control port.

1 Like

@qubenix Can you report it to Bisq upstream please and link to your ticket?

1 Like

Reported Tor over Tor upstream: https://github.com/bisq-network/bisq/issues/1761.

2 Likes

coinpayments was an easy and friendly crypto payments gateway. Now they too require full KYC including selfies and everything.