Why do you prefer Fluxbox over Openbox for the featherweight setup?I do not necessarily. I actually prefer to use JWM for the featherweight (see below). Still, Fluxbox is more "complete" - compared to Openbox - as a standalone (ships a taskbar for example, besides other things). That's why I was saying this.
We can discuss this in the future. We have very similar ideas about it anyway.Great. I got somewhat further here, i.e. I made at least some decisions (for me personally). Applies to both feather- and lightweight. That is to say:
- Image viewer: http://xsisqox.github.io/Viewnior/about.html
- Text Editor/IDE: http://www.geany.org/
- File Manager: currently prefer Thunar here for lightweight, undecided about featherweight
- TE: Terminator in Launchpad for lightweight, undecided about featherweight
Was working/discussing with Patrick yesterday to get Pidgin and KeePassX integrated into Whonix by default, i.e. desktop independent. We also talked about Thunderbird+Torbirdy - this is difficult though due to the availability of Torbirdy for Wheezy.
I tried it but I don't know what is #!#! is just short for "crunchbang". So, how do you like it? The overall desktop UX, I mean.
I don't see much differences between Fluxbox and Openbox. Anything specific I should check out?Tabbed windows in Fluxbox. Definitely check it out. Please also checkout dmenu (Alt+F3 in #!).
I prefer LXpanel over tint2. Coming from Windows, application menu & a quick launch area are a must for me.Haven't tinkered with tint2 too much so far, but I'm pretty sure this is a matter of configuration. tint2 is very popular.
I started from the basics - testing window managers.Try LinuxBBQ "Gangbang edition" - 53 WMs on a LiveCD(Sid). EDIT: Check this out > http://crunchbang.org/forums/viewtopic.php?id=18273
I can't see us using JWM. It's looks older then Win95. My very last choice of the four.I like IceWM better then JWM, mostly because of the panel but still Win98 at best.
I left this for the end Speaking of featherweight here (my current personal focus), not lightweight: JWM actually is my favourite, don’t be fooled by the look of it (we’ll “paint” it). My reasoning:
- it’s FAST (fastest stacking WM around - according to Arch Wiki + my own testing)
- Memory footprint: 3MB
- it follows the traditional, i.e. Windows desktop (root menu, pager, quicklaunch, taskbar, clock) - all in one package. Less alien than Fluxbox.
- Both Damn Small Linux and Puppy Linux ship it as a default
- Its configuration is straight forward XML. Just one conf file ~/.jwmrc
- It’s actively developed.
Theming is somewhat non-existent with JWM (just colors, fonts, sizes) but I’m going to put lipstick on it anyways (deviantart encourages). Also a good thing, i.e less bloat. I’m pretty sure that we could integrate/theme it and you’d like it then. For lightweight such radical measures (like JWM) aren’t needed (not advertised by me).
Other than JWM (and IceWM) for featherweight - /me hides - I’m (again) much in favour of what the guys over at http://suckless.org/ are doing. First and foremost “dmenu”. Debian ships “suckless-tools” which also includes http://st.suckless.org/ and tools | suckless.org software that sucks less