No.
what’s the reason for moving away from utm?
Not gonna answer for Patrick, but it seems no one had clearly said we are moving away from UTM. But it would make sense because most of the build that is made for whonix is for virtualbox. Like if you can combine a lot of the config from windows, linux and even previous macos intel that uses virtualbox. Then it would be less hassle to maintain.
Also as i have understood, no one is maintaining the UTM build that i know off. Sorry not been here in a while so not followed on the project for a while. But there was no one who maintained it when i was here last time.
Also wanted to point out that if we got this build working you could also run it on fedora asahi Linux on apple silicon which has been the best Linux experience so far for me
@Patrick would this command work for building for vbox
~/derivative-maker/derivative-maker --flavor whonix-gateway-xfce --target virtualbox --arch arm64 --repo true
It really helps to read a few posts before posting.
Any guess how much work itd be @Patrick? My company uses macbooks so i have access to apple silicon. Could give it a whirl, but havent been keeping up in a while. Life has been a lot
Just curious rough estimate of what in derivative maker might be problematic
No guesses.
10-4