Reading comprehension 101 to the rescue!
The platform must be somewhat popular or show potential to become somewhat popular.
Popular as in number of users, not as in the “liked by you” kind of popularity. Somewhat popular is a subjective statement open to interpretation. Gab has a million users. “potential” means not popular now, but can happen.
Not in the criteria
This argument sounds awfully close to :
“Tor is used by criminals therefore you are a criminal if you support unconditional privacy”
“Facebook developed an exploit to attack a user therefore you promote user compromise”
Your fallacy is the same old and tired one made by Big Brother and it even goes beyond attacking platform safe harbor protections to associating opinions of other users with another user of the platform. Not even the US gov is that bad yet, but I am sure you will be both on the same page once they claim to be doing it to protect your views.
- Asks for explanation
- Get’s one
- Pretends they can’t read and demands it again
People would respect you more if you say what you mean instead of feigning ignorance. Say you disagree. It’s OK! FYI in actual free societies, everybody is allowed to have different opinions including stuff you don’t like. It’s a feature not a bug.
Keep in mind that branding anyone who looks at you funny, “fascist” and “Nazi” is an insult to the memory of true victims of Fascism and makes you no different than the very Fascists you pursue.