[HOME] [DOWNLOAD] [DOCS] [NEWS] [SUPPORT] [TIPS] [ISSUES] [CONTRIBUTE] [DONATE]

using logos for Whonix discourse forum categories

i think patrick can talk with qubes team about this no ? or increase the size of the images.

im actually laughing that there is a laws for a pic on the internet. (no offense but really silly).

Good day,

of course, in the case of the “Qubes-devs”, this should be possible to settle through proper communication, my post was mainly attributed to pictures in general, the logo of Qubes was just a perfect example, as it is already in use. Now, whether such a law is necessary or not is of course debatable, though I actually can see a certain necessity for it, as digital property should, at least in my eyes, receive the same kind of protection, as “analogue” intellectual property. That this kind of protection in general can go to far (something we currently can witness with the “Leistungsschutsrecht/Protection of done work” or for years with the German GEMA) is of course undeniable, though that doesn’t make protection in general bad for content producers.

By the way, the “KVM-logo” is licensed under CC and may be redistributed and modified by anyone, as long as credit is given properly.

Have a nice day,

Ego

if im living as a fully anonymous in your countries i wouldnt care for laws.we r actually protecting ppl from laws lol. but yeah for me i dont like anyone get hurt or pay any fees for a pathetic pic made by electrons… so yeah i should consider this in ur cases then.

thought once im oppressed with laws where i do live but it seems that we r in the same packet or me even more freely on the internet.

Qubes logo source:

Qubes logo license:

Good day,

ok, sorry, I was mainly using Wikipedia as the source, if that’s the case I might have to change it on there then.

Have a nice day,

Ego

I cut the textual part “KVM” from the KVM logo and left the symbol. Looks better now.

1 Like

A lot categories have images now. Please suggest images for the missing ones.

great then . what do u think of this as an apparmor logo?

not sure about their licenses not getting it is it free to use or not:-
http://www.shutterstock.com/license

for the recycle bin choose one of these:-

http://www.iconarchive.com/show/blue-icons-by-shek0101/blue-recycle-bin-icon.html

or

http://www.iconarchive.com/show/fs-icons-by-franksouza183/Places-trash-empty-icon.html

or

http://www.iconarchive.com/show/robots-icons-by-proycontec/robot-trash-full-icon.html

AppArmor logo is already done.

Shutterstock is [only?] commercial.

http://www.iconarchive.com/show/fs-icons-by-franksouza183/Places-trash-empty-icon.html is good.
http://www.webcitation.org/6dMJyUJ4h

Done.

1 Like

for Tor and general anonymity i see the best choice is to put anonymous logo since it means also everyone (general) can be anonymous (included Tor and everything related to it).

choose one of these:-

https://whyweprotest.net/attachments/nzlfnl-png.131373/

license is free:- https://whyweprotest.net/threads/wanted-source-on-blue-gold-anon-logo.88982/

or

license couldnt know:- http://diradiocast.com/dinmn/hkeg/2014/08/11/anonymous-hacktivists-launch-operation-ferguson-in-wake-of-mike-brown-shooting/

or

license i couldnt know:- https://tad-do.net/tag/anonymous/

or

license is free:- http://www.resimsi.com/preview/large/10649/anonymous-4.html

or

license DMCA:- http://wallpapers55.com/dcma/

(u can cut/resize the choose able image)

I think we should not use the anonymous logo, because in that context that label doesn’t apply here.

ok np , c these for example:-

http://www.iconarchive.com/show/clean-3d-icons-by-mysitemyway/glossy-3d-blue-shield-icon.html

or

license:- i think no ?:- https://guardianproject.info/apps/

or

license:- GNU Lesser General Public License

or

license i couldnt know:- http://www.control4.com/blog/2015/02/securing-your-connected-life

for arabic support section put:-

http://www.iconarchive.com/show/red-orb-alphabet-icons-by-iconarchive/Question-mark-icon.html

or

http://www.iconarchive.com/show/characters-icons-by-dooffy/0-Question-mark-icon.html

http://www.iconarchive.com/show/characters-icons-by-dooffy/0-Question-mark-icon.html freeware is bad. But http://www.iconarchive.com/show/red-orb-alphabet-icons-by-iconarchive/Question-mark-icon.html license is ok.

1 Like

It’s hard to find free images that express something clearly and universally inside of 26x26 pixels… with an open license, no attribution*, and in a consistent 3D colorful style.

I went to https://www.iconfinder.com/ and looked for stuff with their most permissive license “Free For Commerical Use”, plus no attribution requirements. If that’s not good enough, we’ll have to hire someone.

I haven’t found ones for all categories, but here are some candidates for “Website”

Anonymity:

Maybe a “?” icon would work, or a simple mask.

Development:

Maybe a single chemistry beaker.

Staff:

Support:

  • I say “no attribution” because I don’t think we want a paragraph of author attribution, expressed consent, website links, and GPL notices for each 26x26 icon we use. However, this does remove many candidates.

Yes. Those all look good. Can use. We just need something for our brains to help more quickly navigate.

A linux cd burn icon can be something burning.

https://raw.githubusercontent.com/Whonix/anon-icon-pack/master/usr/share/icons/anon-icon-pack/nerolinux.ico

Needless to say, there is no fire at all involved. Yet this analogy makes us quickly find the icon.

nero icon very common , its better not to use closed source programs icons.

[Imprint] [Privacy Policy] [Cookie Policy] [Terms of Use] [E-Sign Consent] [DMCA] [Contributors] [Investors] [Priority Support] [Professional Support]