- Removed Elude, FSFe, Keybase onion mirrors since they are down.
- Added geti2p gitlab onion mirror.
- Rearrange Onion+TLS into one sequence.
"http://47ggr2fa3vnwfyhvgskzdmr3i32eijwymxohtxsls45dulmriwxszjad.onion # https://archive.ph/fzYcK"
The part after the hash (“#
”) is the comment field. It should contain some sort of hint what it is. That’s because later it will be visible in sdwdate log.
For example:
“http://searxspbitokayvkhzhsnljde7rqmn7rvoga6e4waeub3h7ug3nghoad.onion # https://web.archive.org/web/20210525165705/https://searx.space/ https://searx.space”
Then easy to see it’s searx.space
.
ok done, for archive.ph archived links yeah they are unknown from the look at the links which is not similar to archive.org version because they are shortened.
A post was split to a new topic: sdwdate way of verifying the time source accuracy
Thanks, merged!
https://github.com/Kicksecure/sdwdate/compare/master...nurmagoz:sdwdate:master
Finished cleaning sdwdate mirrors.
Thank you! Merged!
I couldn’t find the devcon onion. Therefore replaced.
New upgrade to the mirrors.
"https://ezdhgsy2aw7zg54z6dqsutrduhl22moami5zv2zt6urr6vub7gs6wfad.onion # https://web.archive.org/web/20210604184215/https://defcon.org/"
Where can I see ezdhgsy2aw7zg54z6dqsutrduhl22moami5zv2zt6urr6vub7gs6wfad.onion
on that web archive link?
Done, added to the pull request.
Thanks! Merged.
This is now in all Whonix 17 repositories.
Seemed a pretty important usability hot fix to avoid the “sdwdate shows X (error symbol) issue”.
(sdwdate and sdwdate-gui development thread - #397 by Patrick)
Thank you! Merged.
Merged. Thank you!
"http://wmj5kiic7b6kjplpbvwadnht2nh2qnkbnqtcv3dyvpqtz7ssbssftxid.onion # https://web.archive.org/web/20200629165325/https://about.0xacab.org/ https://about.0xacab.org"
redirects to clearnet and then “onion available” redirects to:
http://wmj5kiic7b6kjplpbvwadnht2nh2qnkbnqtcv3dyvpqtz7ssbssftxid.onion:44203/
Same domain name but with a weird port 44203
. Seems like a bug on their server side.
I noticed that and we cant do much about it, their gitlab doesnt accept new members directly unless admin approval (and the activity of that page/tickets isnt great).
A ticket has been made to address this (a similar ticket was created since 4 years ago, nothing done towards it).