Either config or --clearnet. Both is ok too but unnecessary.
bash -x /usr/bin/torbrowser --clearnet
This is the new code to be executed.
+ tb_clearnet --clearnet
+ test -f /home/user/.tb/tor-browser/clearnet-marker
+ '[' '!' true = true ']'
+ '[' '!' true = true ']'
+ diff /usr/share/tb-updater/tb_without_tor_settings.js /home/user/.tb/tor-browser/Browser/TorBrowser/Data/Browser/profile.default/user.js
+ test -f /home/user/.tb/tor-browser/Browser/TorBrowser/Data/Browser/profile.default/user.js
+ true 'some version exists'
+ test -f clearnet-marker
+ TOR_SKIP_CONTROLPORTTEST=1
+ TOR_SKIP_LAUNCH=1
+ TOR_TRANSPROXY=1
+ export TOR_SKIP_CONTROLPORTTEST TOR_SKIP_LAUNCH TOR_TRANSPROXY
Did you use the latest version from https://github.com/Whonix/tb-starter/blob/master/usr/bin/torbrowser?
That is actually the output of open-link-confirmation which runs with xtrace by default. Weāll need the output of bash -x /usr/bin/torbrowser --clearnet
to see what tb-starter is doing.
Could you please use tb-updater
, ~/.tb/tor-browser
and ~/.tb/tor-browser/start-tor-browser.desktop
for experiments?
TODO
- How to use Tor Browser without Tor in Whonix.
Wondering what is meant with that. Perhaps even I wrote that.
Does it mean, "use torbrowser --clearnet
in Whonix-Workstation so Tor Browser if you want to use Tor Browser for user -> Tor -> tunnel-link -> destination
? That should work.
But then I am wondering if --clearnet
is the best name for this new feature. In Debian --clearnet
makes sense. In Whonix, not so much. Should I rename that command line option? Any naming suggestion? Or just add an additional --alias
that does the same?