//cc @marmarek Please have a look the post above mine.
It’s a nice table! @entr0py Perhaps add DispVM template or is it the same as TemplateBasedVM?
Could you please add the table to Whonix or Qubes wiki? (The latter would be better since it specific to Qubes, not Whonix. However having this table anywhere for reference would help a lot.)
Questions:
-
When trying to start a DispVM for the first time, it actually starts the DispVM template such as
whonix-ws-dvm
. After shut down, using the very same shortcut to start the DispVM, it starts an actual DispVM startingDisp[...]
. The user may be confusing the DispVM template for the actual DispVM since there is no graphical explanation what is happening. Is that right? If so, shall we open a usability bug? -
How to start the DispVM Template (such as
whonix-ws-dvm
) for a second or subsequent time?
It’s maybe not ideal to introduce sys-whonix-dispVM
as UpdateVM
. That would hopefully only be an intermediary solution if anything. (As per this)
Could a whonix-ws
based DispVM act as UpdateVM? Does that even require development on the Whonix side? (UpdateVM might work out of the box? Qubes updates proxy likely not?)
Hm. Good question. Still trying to wrap my head around it.
Related:
- Tor Browser Advanced Topics
- https://github.com/Whonix/tb-updater/blob/master/lib/systemd/system/tb-updater-first-boot.service
- https://github.com/Whonix/tb-updater/blob/master/usr/lib/tb-updater/first-boot-home-population
Based on that, what about the following implementation?
-
- Don’t run
tb-updater-first-boot.service
in TemplateVM. (Already implemented.)
- Don’t run
-
- Don’t run
tb-updater-first-boot.service
in DispVM Template. How could being run inside DispVM Template be detected from within thefirst-boot-home-population
script? @marmarek
- Don’t run
-
- Copy from
/var/cache/tb-binary
to user home. (Already implemented.)
- Copy from
-
→ That would result in
whonix-ws-dvm
based DispVMs inheriting upgraded versions of Tor Browser if thetb-updater
package inwhonix-ws
TemplateVM gets upgraded. That would spare the user from having to runtb-updater
insidewhonix-ws-dvm
, which really wouldn’t be great to require (one VM more to update, one more complication).