Also if we add it on one version (x over Tor vs Tor over x) it should be on both and not only on one of the two.
This is hopefully only temporary. Above is not a good style. I think users don’t like documentation for the thing they want to work on split among multiple pages. They want the exact thing they want to do all on one coherent page. This however would require a ton of new wiki templates which then get reused for the many combinations before/after Tor vs VPN vs proxy vs ssh. Perhaps not realistic? Too much work? That’s why above’s quote is stressed.
Could you please move to Combining Tunnels with Tor and rewrite from VPN to tunnel-link? Since it really applies to any kind of tunnel link.
Can be more generic if this can become a fully agreed Whonix team speech. Good idea.
Made more generic. Limitations on Free Speech on Whonix Website since applies to all, wiki, forums, comments, …
Limitations on Free Speech on Whonix Website is too specific for Wiki Comments Policy? Applies more generally. Own page?
I could do that but I have a feeling I would be booted off the Whonix team and erased from the Whonix history books when you saw it.
In all seriousness, it could get it done but its not something that you would be able to use. My bash skills are not that advanced.
That would be a good idea. Was reading an article (don’t remember where) but employees in big Chines telecom companies use VPNs to access twitter and other social media platforms that are censored. All they really need is something to circumvent the firewall. Maybe Failed close not always necessary?
I could do that but I have a feeling I would be booted off the Whonix team and erased from the Whonix history books when you saw it.
In all seriousness, it could get it done but its not something that you would be able to use. My bash skills are not that advanced.
That would be a good idea. Was reading an article (don’t remember where) but employees in big Chines telecom companies use VPNs to access twitter and other social media platforms that are censored. All they really need is something to circumvent the firewall. Maybe Failed close not always necessary?
Yes. For some websites it’s easy. VPN = access. Tor = no access. No
other repercussions. Specifically to just get read access where Tor exit
relays are blocked to something one doesn’t have to go crazy about fail
closed mechanism.
At maximum more technical users are reading and capable to use this. However these concepts (mentioned above) are not used elsewhere in wiki and even if they are the links are missing. Also I am nitpicky about terminology, for example multi-Workstation will be less understood then [[Mutliple Whonix-Workstation|Mutliple Whonix-Workstation]] which we use more or less consistent thorough the wiki. So all this needs is a nitpicky revision.