Also important: Binary Build Locations? Project Controlled Builds or Third-Party Controlled Builds?
I am not sure Kicksecure could require project controlled builds as a criteria because other browser projects may also not have this feature. If it was an in-house browser project, then the criteria would be more stringent and this would be a criteria.
It’s not a criteria yet for Kicksecure default browser choice because I didn’t survey yet how other browser projects handle this.
Simple and brilliant. Yeah. Why not add “Browser” as the second word.
You can also widen the search. What are successful project names generally? Microsoft? 2 words only. Simple. But hard to argue its success is based on that since they existed for decades already.
Interesting.
I mean, yeah, if it works…
Sounds good.
Excellent.
Long-term maintainability: The browser project should be active and well-funded (or backed by a strong community), with regular security updates. If it’s abandoned or poorly maintained, users could be left vulnerable to known exploits. Also, switching browsers is hard for some users. Therefore, the default browser must be a stable choice for years.
This criteria is more about the “bus factor”.
Very cool.
Great!
Yeah, I am very much expecting a rabbit holes.
Interesting. Got any references?
Yes, that sounds super fragile and unmaintainable.
For now it’s your decision to make.
I don’t have the bandwith for In-House Browser Development and would prefer if this is maintained as an independent project and gains traction. I do depend on the wider community to scrutinize the project.