Then we need to update at same time debug-misc + documentation.
Have you tested that? A number of software uses databases behind the scenes like mediawiki and discourse and bringing them to a crawl would destroy the usecase. Some IM clients use dbs too.
As long as documented then at least they will have a clue what needs to be done.
What do you think?
This one is fine. kernel.perf_event_paranoid=3
requires a kernel patch but some distros (such as Debian) includes this by default. If the patch isn’t used then it’ll be the same as setting it to 2.
Interesting tool, anything that can contributed to it?
That comment needs an update.
debian bug report: Please reconsider enabling the user namespaces by default
It seems that next debian version will have unpriv user ns by default.
Related:
https://forums.whonix.org/t/flathub-as-a-source-of-software/10706/6
Related to Linux kernel user namespaces:
Debian package bubblewrap
will set kernel.unprivileged_userns_clone=1
in Debian bullseye
and above. bubblewrap
will be no longer suid by default.
Great! Merged!
What do we do with debian/control
?
(Used for apt-cache show security-misc
, potentially packages.debian.org APT package repository web interface for deb.whonix.org) and README_generic.md
?)
Simplify debian/control
so it doesn’t have to be duplicated? Delete / avoid creation of README_generic.md
?
I think it should just contain a basic description and a link to the Github repository for more detailed information.