@killswitch please continue to shill for your service while not acknowledging the systemic flaws in using VPNs for security.
So Cryptostorm is Libre to the core, it's Gratis for those who truly need to do things and don't have a budget, it has a sensible revenue model, which Tor & I2P lack, and it solves for anonymity at the purchase level, permitting zero customer knowledge use of the network by those who are paying.
I would hardly call a few configuration files “open to the core”. There is nothing sensible about charging for a privacy/anonymity service. Not only does it make it out of reach for those who need it the most but the financial paper trail is dangerous for users. There is no such thing as “zero customer knowledge use” anyone sitting on your network can do traffic analysis and deanonymize the source of a certain stream of packets. Vanilla SSL does not protect against website fingerprinting - a simple attack that a large network adversary can pull off without even accessing your network. VPNs are a single point of failure that harm users with their false sense of security. They are only relevant to our the conversation in a very narrow usecase and IMO ineffectively so.
There are some VPN providers that offer low speed Gratis service, there are some that permit purchase by bitcoin or other relatively anonymous methods, but I don't think any of them offer the same level of anonymity that comes with a zero customer knowledge configuration, and this is the only VPN provider I know of that is performing and publishing research on new threats.
You and Joe Blow VPN cannot provide the anonymity or privacy guarantees you claim. I just explained why. Unlike the poor bastards that are happy to pay you to MITM their internet traffic, no one here believes your false claims. Take them somewhere else.