Unfortunately anonymity is not possible for my purposes. So I have various Pseudonyms isolated to their own workstations. For me, this is unavoidable.
I happen to agree with Kammerer’s assessment of browser fingerprinting. I am already pseudonomynous, that is the very best I can hope to achieve based on my use case.
Are you saying that software installed in one TemplateM can be used to correlate all TemplateBasedVMs?
In this case, I don’t think that would apply. Bitwarden is not installed locally using a package manager. It’s just the browser XPI, if I’m not mistaken. This is installed in each VM, on a case-by-case basis, but should have no code being shared between instances if I understand correctly.
If you mean something else, then I beg your pardon.
Each bitwardn instance has it’s own login, it’s own set of login credentials. There’s nothing being shared whatsoever, as far as I can tell.